Scientists have discovered a previously unknown diversity of fungi living far beneath the seafloor throughout the world’s oceans.
“Walking in a forest, everyone knows how important fungi are on land in decomposing fallen trees, leaves, and other material,” said William Orsi, a postdoctoral fellow at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI). “But nobody knew whether fungi performed a similar function in deep subseafloor ocean sediments. Our study shows that fungi are also very important in the subseafloor in a similar way”—breaking down organic matter into nutrients and carbon dioxide that other organisms need and use.
The study, published Feb. 15, 2013, in PLoS One, also produced another unexpected finding: evidence in seafloor sediments for living cells from organisms that usually live near the sea surface. Either the cells were still alive, perhaps in a quiescent form such as a spore, seed, or cyst; or scientists will have to reevaluate the validity of a method they have traditionally used to detect the presence of living organisms in various habitats.
Orsi and his colleagues, microbiologists Virginia Edgcomb of WHOI and Jennifer Biddle of the University of Delaware, identified at least 70 kinds of fungi in sediments collected from six sites around the world at different depths from the surface and different subseafloor conditions. Samples came from depths of 1.8 meters (nearly 6 feet) to 48.1 meters (nearly 158 feet) below the seafloor.
To show that the fungi in the sediments were alive, the scientists analyzed the samples for ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA), which living cells use to produce proteins. Because rRNA normally degrades within hours of a cell’s death, scientists routinely use its presence as proof that the organism it came from is still alive.
The researchers used a recently developed technique (called 454 pyrosequencing) to detect rRNA sequences for up to 75 percent of the fungal species present in samples, compared to only 5 to 10 percent detectable by earlier methods.
“We were able to sequence much more deeply into subseafloor rRNA than had ever been done before, “ said Orsi. “That allowed us to find some rare things that had been missed in earlier studies.”
In addition to identifying rRNA from many more species of fungi than had been found there before, the scientists also found rRNA from organisms that should not be living in deep sediments. For example, all of the samples contained rRNA from diatoms, a type of phytoplankton. Diatoms live near the sea surface, where they can obtain enough sunlight to power their photosynthetic machinery.
After diatoms die, their hard shells may fall to the seafloor and become buried and preserved in sediment. (In fact, scientists use some species of diatom shells to estimate the age of sediments they are found in.) But seafloor sediments should not contain living diatoms.
Finding rRNA from diatoms thus posed a challenge for Orsi and his colleagues: If the rRNA of diatoms was persisting that long in the subseafloor, then perhaps the fungal RNA they found also came from dead organisms.
“We had to come up with some kind of evidence that these fungi are alive and the other guys aren’t alive,” said Orsi. In further investigations, they found that fungal rRNA sequences strongly correlated with organic carbon, a food source for fungi, and with inorganic carbon (mostly carbon dioxide), a waste product of fungal respiration. By contrast, rRNA from diatoms and other groups that should not be living in the sediments were not related to the amount of organic or inorganic carbon in the habitats in which they were found.
The scientists had taken rigorous steps to ensure that the seafloor sediment samples were not contaminated by outside sources, so why rRNA from diatoms was found deep below the seafloor remains a mystery. Orsi said he and colleagues are now conducting experiments to distinguish between two possibilities: Either cells containing rRNA remained alive buried in sediments, perhaps in a dormant form; or their rRNA had persisted long after their death and long after scientists expected it would. If the latter, scientists will have to reevaluate how they interpret rRNA to determine the presence of living organisms.