Disclaimer: These postings were sent to us from a variety of media sources over the Internet. The content has not been reviewed for scientific accuracy or edited in any manner.

Copyright 1998 Sun-Sentinel Company

Sun-Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL)

March 19, 1998, Thursday, Final EDITION

SECTION: NATIONAL, Pg. 1A

LENGTH: 1285 words

HEADLINE: A FISH KILL MYSTERY;

MICRO-ORGANISM SUSPECTED IN OUTBREAKS FROM FLORIDA TO S. AMERICA

BYLINE: ROBERT McCLURE; Staff Writer

BODY:

A weird new fish disease that is causing a grotesque wasting away of fish near Stuart is only the latest in a string of unexplained fish kills stretching from Florida to South America.

A suspect in the latest outbreak is a microscopic life form, a close cousin of a chameleon-like, single-cell animal that masquerades as a plant.

The masquerading cousin, Pfiesteria piscicida, has been blamed for killing millions of fish in the Mid-Atlantic region. Both organisms are thought to thrive in polluted waters.

In the last two weeks, state scientists have launched an intensive investigation of the outbreak in the Indian River and St. Lucie River near Stuart, about 30 miles north of West Palm Beach.

Meanwhile, they remain mystified about another series of fish kills, including one last year stretching from the coral reefs off Broward and Palm Beach counties to the Caribbean Sea and Venezuela.

In each incident, fish turned up with ugly sores. Most sores are red, like a skinned knee, though the ones in the latest outbreak are white, rotting, ulcerated lesions.

''We're seeing more and more fish with lesions,'' said Leigh Demateis, a spokeswoman for the Florida Department of Environmental Protection.

A state task force convened to investigate sudden ''blooms'' of algae and microscopic, algae-like microbes possibly at fault in the kills meets today in Miami.

The discovery of diseased mullet, snook and other fish in the Indian River near Stuart has not been tied to any micro-organism. But state scientists, who played a major role in the discovery of toxic marine microbes in the last decade, are looking closely at them as a possible cause.

''The problem is much more widespread than you might have thought a few years ago,'' said Donald Anderson, director of the National Office for Marine Biotoxins and Harmful Algae.

The tiny toxic creatures, a subset of a group of organisms known as dinoflagellates, are worrisome because they have caused serious health problems in fishermen, scientists and others who were exposed in North Carolina and Chesapeake Bay. Do sores harm people?

Yet it remains unclear whether the sores on the fish near Stuart could harm people, said Steven Wiersma, deputy state epidemiologist.

At least 55 toxic, microscopic creatures are known to reside in Florida waters, but scientists still are working to understand what makes them bloom into fish-killing numbers, said Ed Conklin, director of the DEP's division of marine resources.

Only in the last year or so have researchers even known about the existence of the microbe found near Stuart, Cryptoperidiniopsis. But they quickly figured out it is very similar to Pfiesteria piscicida, a somewhat better-known creature discovered a decade ago by North Carolina and Florida researchers.

Dubbed ''the cell from hell'' by some scientists, Pfiesteria can assume more than 20 forms.

Pfiesteria, a master of disguises, can lurk in the sediment as a benign cyst until conditions are right for it to emerge in its toxic form.

It looks and usually acts like a plant, appearing to live by photosynthesis, the process by which plants create food from sunlight. But in fact, Pfiesteria steals chloroplasts, plants' food-making apparatuses, from algae.

Pfiesteria propels itself with wavy, armlike appendages known as flagella, a component of the name dinoflagellate. When conditions are right, Pfiesteria emerges in its animal form and releases a still-unidentified toxin. This attacks fish, causing sores to develop where the fish's protective, mucus-like coating sloughs off. Pfiesteria eats the sloughed-off skin, then metamorphoses into another form that allows it to feast on fish carcasses once the fish die. Millions of fish killed In North Carolina and the Chesapeake Bay areas, the micro-organism has been blamed for killing millions of fish over the past decade.

Pfiesteria's toxic stage is thought to be stimulated by the presence of large amounts of algae, another of its food sources. These algae tend to grow explosively in polluted waters.

The current outbreak in Florida's Indian River comes after state and federal water managers disgorged billions of gallons of polluted floodwater from Lake Okeechobee. The water carries a heavy load of pollutants from agricultural sources, including cattle manure washing into the rain-swollen lake.

Although researchers have detected Pfiesteria's cousin, Cryptoperidiniopsis, in waters where the Stuart-area outbreak is happening, much work remains to be done examining the diseased fish. The cause could turn out to be something else.

Resarchers theorize that the Cryptoperidiniopsis acts like its cousin, causing fish to slough off their protective mucus coatings. That may allow bacteria and fungus to attack the fish, causing the sores.

''We really don't know that much about this organism,'' said Ann Forstchen, a state researcher.

It's the first time Cryptoperidiniopsis has been associated with a fish kill in Florida. But the fish in the Indian River look ''strikingly similar,'' Forstchen said, to another fish kill in the same location in 1980.

That year also marked the beginning of a series of at least four fish kills affecting angelfish, rock beauties and other species on South Florida's coral reefs. Similar outbreaks occurred in 1993, 1994 and 1997.

Fish affected in these outbreaks had fin and tail rot and were infested by parasites, including one named Brooklynella hostilis. They had a white slimy or fluffy coating and blotchy lesions, leading to scientists' description: ''slime-blotch disease.''

In the 1997 outbreak, researchers soon began hearing reports of similar fish kills in the Caribbean and Venezuela, and similar but apparently non-lethal maladies among fish in the Bahamas and Puerto Rico. Some of those areas also were affected in the 1980 outbreak.

But researchers have yet to pinpoint a cause. They think some agent weakens the fishes' immune systems, leaving them vulnerable to the parasites. If true, it would be like a fish version of AIDS.

A leading scientist from Florida, Jan Landsberg of the DEP, said in a paper on the 1993-94 reef fish kills that it appeared a toxin might be at work. She speculated that a number of health conditions among sealife, including coral diseases and tumors on turtles, could be related to biological toxins transferred through the marine food chain.

The DEP's Forstchen said she doubts the fish kills along the reefs are related to the outbreak at the Indian River. But Anderson, head of the national marine biotoxins office, said it's quite possible that a third organism with similarities to Crypto and Pfiesteria was at work.

''It wouldn't surprise me,'' Anderson said. ''There's no reason ( Pfiesteria's method) can't work elsewhere in the oceans as a way of life.''

It's still possible, researchers say, that all of these events could be explained by some natural cycle. But there is another explanation, too: While toxic dinoflagellates have been around for a long time, people are now doing something that encourages their growth beyond natural limits.

Could sewage and similar pollution be at work? Some researchers think so, Forstchen said. Perhaps the microscopic bugs are like roaches _ they've been around forever, but their population explodes when food is left around.

Wade Aycock of Stuart, one of the first to report the Indian River fish disease, thinks the problem is related to pollution.

''Our river is so sick that it may never recover unless something is done right,'' Aycock said. ''It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see that something is long past due to be done about it.''

GRAPHIC: PHOTO MAP, Stuart News photo/JIM URICH; (color) Fish caught about 30 miles north of West Palm Beach show various stages of decay. Staff graphic/CHRIS JOHNSON; Map: North Ameirca and South America - Southern tip of U.S. and Norhtern portion of South America (Venezuela).

LOAD-DATE: March 20, 1998