Disclaimer: These postings were sent to us from a variety of media sources over the Internet. The content has not been reviewed for scientific accuracy or edited in any manner.

Copyright 1998 Stuart News Company

The Stuart News/Port St. Lucie News (Stuart,FL)

May 16, 1998, Saturday

SECTION: Local; Pg. B1

LENGTH: 312 words

HEADLINE: EXPERTS: DATA FROM RIVERS OK

BYLINE: Andrew Conte of the News staff

BODY:

Troubled Waters

Water samples from the St. Lucie Estuary show nothing unusual, environmental officials said. Data from rivers OK, experts say

PORT ST. LUCIE - Water collected from the St. Lucie Estuary Monday had a few trace pesticides and metals but little to cause concern, state environmental officials said Friday.

Water samples contained traces of the metals copper, lead and chromium and traces of the pesticides atrazine and arsenic, said Doug Strom, environmental expert at the state Department of Environmental Protection.

"These are typical of any water body that gets runoff, and the levels seem fairly low," Strom said. "There doesn't appear to be any real smoking gun here."

The tests were conducted as part of the state's investigation into thousands of sick fish in the estuary that have developed lesions and open sores since early March.

Ann Forstchen, a DEP biologist in St. Petersburg, reviewed the test results and confirmed that nothing seemed out of the ordinary.

"There's really no new news here," she said.

State biologists spent Monday through Wednesday sampling fish in the St. Lucie River and Indian River Lagoon to determine what percentage of them have the lesions.

They found five lesioned fish Monday and two Tuesday but have not said how many were caught Wednesday.

Anglers have brought 12 fish to the DEP's temporary command post in Jensen Beach since Monday, bringing the total for May to 19.

State biologists have speculated that the immediate sick-fish problem may be over, although the long-term circumstances that caused it will remain. Scientists still do not know the exact cause, but they think it might be connected to a microorganism called Cryptoperidiniopsis.

This week's water quality tests do not support any theory that pesticides or metals in the water or sediment were to blame.

LOAD-DATE: May 18, 1998