Please note: You are viewing the unstyled version of this website. Either your browser does not support CSS (cascading style sheets) or it has been disabled. Skip navigation.

1997

  Email    Print  PDF  Change text to small (default) Change text to medium Change text to large

Beaufort Gyre IOEB Refurbished in 1997

Enlarge Image


By 00:15 Z, on April 8, 1997, the Ice Ocean Environmental Buoy (IOEB) deployed in the Beaufort Sea was successfully recovered intact at 79.602 N, 130.62 W. Over the next three days, the instruments on the system were dumped of their data and replaced or refurbished for continued performance. By 01:28 Z, on April 11, the system was once again completely deployed and operational in the the icefloe at 79.547 N, 130.96 W. This IOEB system was originally deployed off the coast of Alaska in 1992, drifted in a large clockwise arc for four years before being visited and refurbished for the first time in April 1996. Both refurbishment operations were staged out of the AES Weather Station at Mould Bay, Canada, with logistic support provided by the Space and Naval Warfare Command (SPAWAR), the 109th Air National Guard (ANG), and Polar Associates. In 1997, however, the distance from Mould Bay to the IOEB was reduced considerably, due to the fact that the buoy was located nearly 245 km further southward than in 1996. The primary objectives for revisiting the IOEB again in 1997 were to recover the sediment trap samples acquired over the previous year, reinstall an Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler (ADCP) onto the mooring system, and to extend the lifetime of the system and all its instrumentation. Each of these objectives was met; in particular, the recovery of the sediment trap samples is particularly noteworthy as it marks the first time that a full year timeseries of valuable particle flux samples acquired under the Arctic pack ice has been obtained from an IOEB.

Remarkably, the entire ice camp operation was performed in only 12 days, including all flights, pioneering and breaking down the ice camp. Due to the professional planning, experience and hardwork of the participants, and good fortune, it is inconceivable that the operation could have been performed more efficiently, or in any less time. The operation could have been extended by poor weather, poor ice conditions for landing (thus requiring the additional time and expense of ferrying by helicopter), or numerous other difficulties associated with the recovery, refit, and redeployment of the IOEB. In fact, between the time of the IOEB recovery and redeployment, the ice camp was separated from the Twin Otter by a wide lead. However, the lead closed when it was time for our return flights, thus alleviating the need to construct an emergency landing strip.

Since redeployment, all instruments (except the S4 module) have been functioning properly and broadcasting reliably. While the transmitters are provided with 3+ year battery packs, most instruments have only 2 year battery packs. The ADCP and S4 will fill their memory in only 1 year. Consequently, we can expect the IOEB to continue to transmit data for several years, but would recommend that the system be refurbished on a 1 to 2 year basis.


Recovery of Beaufort Gyre IOEB in 1997

Scientists from the Japan Marine Science and Technology Center (JAMSTEC) and Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) participated in the operation. From JAMSTEC were Kiyoshi Hatakeyama and Toru Nakamura; from WHOI were John Kemp, Lawrence Costello and Richard Krishfield. Polar Associates provided one field person on the ice (Jeff Lord), and one based in Mould Bay (Ted Gooch). Transportation to and from the ice was by Twin Otter from Kenn Borek Air, piloted by Monty Stevenson and engineered by Dave Bosma.

The science equipment, camp gear, and fuel required for the operation was transported to Mould Bay in March on several C-130 flights by the 109th ANG from Thule AFB in Greenland. On March 30 and 31, all the field personnel travelled together on commercial airlines from Boston, Massachusetts via Ottawa, Ontario to Resolute, Northwest Territories, to meet the Borek Twin Otter. On April 1, the Twin Otter and all personnel arrived in Mould Bay, and an immediate reconaissance was performed over the IOEB site, approximately 350 km west of Mould Bay. The weather was clear and the buoy apex was easily spotted within a few minutes, approximately 25 m from a large ridge which apparently was formed from the refrozen lead which we used as our runway last year. The IOEB was upright, had a light covering of snow, but the meteorological mast and ice strings were intact and without damage. Although a landing did not take place, the pilot was confident that he could land on same floe with the buoy. Consequently, a helicopter was not required, and a corresponding amount of time and work was saved.

On April 2, the first landing on the icefloe occurred, and a load of camp gear deposited. During the next three days, all the remaining gear and all the personnel were installed at the buoy site, employing a total of 8 Twin Otter flights. The camp consisted of three tents, each providing workspace and housing two individuals. The recovery site and apparatus were prepared on April 5 and 6, and an ice core was taken in the icefloe near the IOEB. On the morning of April 7, the retrieval began.

The weather on this day was excellent for the recovery. The skies were clear, there was little wind, and the temperature hovered around -25 øC. The hot water ice drill was started and began cutting a 50 inch hole around the apex at 9:30 AM local (15:30 Z). In less than two hours, the drill penetrated the 14 10” of ice. The ice around the apex and cable was removed by pickaxe and chainsaw. This required the most time and labor of the recovery operation, and the hole was not completely clear of ice until 21:45 Z. Over the next 2.5 hours, each instrument on the mooring system was removed (while being kept warm by a hot air blower), and placed into the science tent. Although it was impossible to keep the sample cups on the sediment trap from freezing during the recovery, fortunately none cracked and no samples were lost. Later, after allowing the system to warm and dry somewhat, the bottles were removed, sealed and stored in a cool environment. All other instruments were allowed to warm and dry overnight in the science tent, and their data dumped the following day.

Full datasets were obtained from each of the three SeaCats on the mooring system, the upper S4 current meter, the transmissometer/fluorometer module, and the sediment trap. Only the deep S4 current meter failed to respond, even when a substitute battery packed was used. Preliminary analysis of the data indicates that the transmitted data compares precisely to the recovered data for each of these instruments, although the recovered data includes points not transmitted, as expected.

Over the next two days, a redeployment site was prepared, the apex refurbished and all instruments initialized for the reinstallation. Meanwhile, a CTD cast was taken down to 500 m through the hole abandoned by the IOEB. The redeployment site was removed about 50 m away from the recovery site, to provide more space away from the icefloe edge. The icefloe thickness was 13 7" here, and another ice core was taken at this site. On April 9, a new 39" deployment hole was cut through the icefloe, and another CTD cast was performed. During this second cast, bottle water for the sediment trap was taken at 100 m.


Redeployment of Beaufort Gyre IOEB in 1997

Enlarge Image


Redeployment of the IOEB began at 3:20 PM local time (21:20 Z). Although the skies were clear, there was a howling wind adding to the cold. The deployment started by lowering the anchor first through the hole in the icefloe, followed immediately by the S4 current meter, and the sediment trap package. Network communications were checked by manually sending the MUSSIC addresses from a laptop. All instruments responded when interogated. A 30 m shot was deployed next, followed by a SeaCat, and communications verified again. After the second 30 m shot and SeaCat, however, communication with the S4 module failed. Repeated attempts were made, but to no avail. After discussing our options, it was agreed that the best course was to proceed with the deployment despite the lack of S4 module transmissions. The reasons for this decision were: 1) the severe cold wind could disable the other instruments already deployed and functioning, upon being brought up (e.g. possible cracking of the SeaCat conductivity cells and sediment trap bottles), 2) the S4 current meter could still be functioning, eventhough the S4 module would not communciate, so there exists a possibility that upon later retrieval this data may be recovered, and 3) the time schedule of the ice camp operation prohibited extending the redeployment. The remaining 30 m shot, ADCP, 5 m shot, and SeaCat were subsequently deployed and communications verified. Finally, the apex was attached and lowered, the ice thermistors and meteorological mast were installed, and the redeployed system was complete by 01:30 Z, April 11.

The final CTD cast was performed on April 11, while packing the IOEB refurbishment and deployment gear. The next day, three Twin Otter flights brought back most of the gear, and two scientists. On April 13, the weather worsened, and all the remaining camp personnel returned with the last full flight of equipment. In retrospect, we are fortunate to have returned when we did, for the weather would not have allowed flights to the ice for a number of days later.


IOEB Deployed from SHEBA in 1997

As part of the Surface Heat Budget of the Arctic Ocean (SHEBA) buoy array, a Japan Marine Science and Technology Center (JAMSTEC) IOEB was deployed from the Des Groseilliers on the way to installing the main ice camp. Initially located about 50 km from the array, the buoy drifted in the same general manner as the main camp, and was recovered from the Louis St. Laurent during breakout of the SHEBA camp the following year. In 365 days, the system drifted a total of 2000 km from the Canada Basin, over the Northwest Ridge and Chukchi Plateau, to the slope of the Makarov Basin. Complete year-long timeseries of air temperature, barometer, buoy drift, and compass heading, were telemetered via Argos during the drift. Partial-year records of wind (< 1/2 year) and ice thermistor profiles (~ 3/4 year) were also acquired. Upon recovery of the buoy, upper ocean temperature and salinity data at 65, 105, and 165 m were retrieved along with current profiles from an ADCP, a timeseries of dissolved oxygen, and biogeochemical samples from a sediment trap.

Scientists from both JAMSTEC and the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution participated in the field operations. On September 30, 1997 enroute to the desired SHEBA camp site, the Des Groseilliers manuevered into a position where the deployment could be performed with the bow crane. Equipment was loaded onto the icefloe, and a 1 m diameter hole cut through the 1.1 m thick icefloe. Anchor first, each instrument was attached to the mooring system and lowered through the icehole. By 23:50 Z, the mooring and surface apex were installed at 75 deg 5.4' N, 140 deg 54.7' W. The meteorological mast and ice thermistors were subsequently installed, the deployment gear loaded back onto the ship, and the cruise resumed. Later, after a problem with the underwater telemetry of the IOEB was identified, the buoy was visited briefly by helicopter, to make a correction which enabled the air and ice data to be transmitted. The ocean data had to be retrieved upon recovery.


Recovery of IOEB Deployed from SHEBA in 1997

Over the next year, the IOEB drifted unattended in a large anticyclonic arc, while constantly updating locations via Argos. In May of 1998, scientists performing maintenance on a nearby buoy did visit the IOEB and surmised that a bear had visited the IOEB, removed the anemometer, and bent the air temperature radiation shield. Actually, the telemetered wind data failed on April 25th (while the IOEB was near 76 N, 164 W), so we believe that was when the bear discovered the buoy. The air temperature measurement does not appear to have been effected.

Recovery of the IOEB was accomplished on October 1, 1998 from the Louis St. Laurent. When found, the surface buoy was tilted at a 30 deg angle within a pressure ridge that appears from tilt data to have surrounded it two weeks previously. The meterorological mast was bent over and the wind monitor was missing, but the apex was undamaged. One out of three ice thermistor strings was still attached to the endcap. These were removed and brought onboard the ship, and ship's bubblers were used in an attempt to blow the mooring free from the broken ice. Due to the high ice concentration, however, the ice could not be removed. Consequently, the icebreaker was maneuvered for several hours to create a large pond. It then became relatively straightforward to pull the mooring system from the water in only a few hours (despite the raw weather), apex first. By 17:12 Z, at 80 deg 39.2' N, 160 deg 10.2' W, the system was completely recovered. Onboard, 24 Mbytes of data from the 150 kHz ADCP was dumped, SeaCat conductivities and temperature timeseries at 3 depths (one with dissolved oxygen) were retrieved, and a complete collection of 21 sediment trap samples were brought back to the lab for further analysis. Unfortunately, the SeaCat at 8 m was found to have failed, and the sensitivity of the fluorometer was too low to provide useful information.

We would like to extend our appreciation to the SHEBA program, chief scientists, and the officers and crew of the Des Grosilliers and Louis St. Laurent, for supporting the IOEB field program.

Last updated: March 18, 2009
 


whoi logo

Copyright ©2007 Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, All Rights Reserved, Privacy Policy.
Problems or questions about the site, please contact webdev@whoi.edu